Proposed pilot in developmentFictional examples only

For Australian commercial cleaning businesses

Contract billing check

Check your invoices against what was agreed.

Compare customer-confirmed prices and approved changes with invoice and credit records. See the differences that need a closer look.

FictionalOne finding, one line

CC-041 / clause 4.2

INV-2041 / line 1

July 2026

Potential underbilling

Every finding names the clause it relies on and the record it was compared with, so you can trace it back.

Fictional example. Not customer data or results.July 2026 / All amounts exclude GST

The same period, read three ways

One billing period, three different findings

Select an account to inspect its supporting sample records.

Agreement / billing referenceConfirmed expectedNet recordedReview result
CC-041 / INV-2041A$3,120.00A$3,000.00 Potential underbillingA$120.00 to review
CC-028 / INV-2033 + CR-0082A$3,000.00A$3,000.00 MatchA$3,200 invoice less A$200 credit
CC-056 / INV-2056UnconfirmedA$2,450.00 Missing evidenceDifference not assessed

All accounts and references are fictional. The amounts are pre-confirmed for this example. A flagged difference needs review; it is not a legal debt or money recovered.

Fictional CC-041 / July 2026

What the check actually puts side by side

Three views of one agreement. The reference, the record, then the difference between them.

CC-041 / clause 4.2Customer-confirmed
Agreement       CC-041
Clause          4.2
Basis           Fixed recurring fee
Confirmed fee   A$3,120.00
Effective from  1 July 2026
Confirmed by    Customer, before comparison
Amounts exclude GST. The customer confirms the fee and the period before anything is compared. The check does not read a rate out of a contract on its own.

The proposed sequence

Records in, confirmed reference, then a comparison

Four stages, in order. Nothing is compared before you confirm the terms it is compared against.

01 / Records

Establish what is in scope

Authorised agreements, approved changes, and the invoice and credit records for the period.

02 / Confirmation

Confirm the reference schedule

You confirm the current fee, the effective period and any approved exceptions, with source references.

03 / Comparison

Compare like with like

The confirmed fee is set against the billing records for the same agreement and the same period.

04 / Review

Decide what the finding means

You or your authorised adviser decides any next action. A difference alone settles nothing.

See how the check would work

Why the order matters

The reference comes first

A comparison is useful only when the agreed terms are clear.

The proposed pilot starts with your agreements and approved changes. You confirm the current fees, the relevant period and any conditions before those amounts are compared with billing records.

A credit can explain an apparent difference. An approved waiver can be a valid exception. A missing amendment leaves a question to resolve.

Agreed terms
A source-linked reference schedule that you confirm.
Actual billing
Invoices and credits allocated to the same agreement and period.
Your review
A comparison report with supporting records and unresolved questions.
48 of 48synthetic checks passed against developer-authored inputs on 22 September 2026.

What that figure does not establish

Thirty-six scenarios and twelve order and repeat-import invariants ran against structured, pre-confirmed inputs. Twenty checks returned UNKNOWN, as expected. It is not an independent audit, an accuracy estimate, evidence of production reliability or a customer outcome.

Read the method and the limits
Proposed founder-assisted pilot

One billing review

A$599

Proposed one-off fee. No automatic subscription. No separate setup fee for this proposed pilot.

Read the full proposed scope
Business
One legal entity
Agreements
Up to five
Review period
Up to three months of recordsThis is the period reviewed, not a delivery deadline.
Volume
Up to 150 document pages and 200 invoice or credit lines
Quote
Final scope and applicable GST treatment must be settled firstThe fee is not presented as including or excluding GST.

Current status / 22 September 2026

A pilot in development

Clause Copilot is being developed by Dylan, a solo founder in Sydney. This is a proposed founder-assisted pilot, not a finished automation platform. No paying Clause customers or customer results have been established in the supplied evidence.

This site accepts no real documents, applications or payments. Delivery and data-handling arrangements need to be settled before real records are supplied.

If your existing billing process already performs this check well, an additional service may not be useful.

Inspect the check for yourself

The sample shows a difference, a credit and missing evidence.